I want a smaller monitor...
For years, I've always been a fan of monitors with a great Dot Pitch. Back when Sony Trinitron screens were "the best" you could get, you'd always find the pictures sharper than on just about any other brand. This was because they had a finer dot pitch.
(Another way of describing dot pitch is how many pixels (dots in groups of red, green and blue) are packed in per centimetre)
I love the resolution of my laptop screen. It is 1920 pixels wide by 1200 pixels high while still only being 17 inches diagonally.
The best dot pitch I've found in a mainstream computer monitor is in a 19 inch screen with a resolution of 1680 by 1050. However, that is still 27% larger dots than my laptop screen. Here is a comparison of my laptop screen to all the common "wide screen" (16:10 ratio) monitors available:
I would very much like to be able to get a desktop version (or 3) of my laptop's display, however, I fear the market for such a screen would be far too "nitch" to be populated.
(Another way of describing dot pitch is how many pixels (dots in groups of red, green and blue) are packed in per centimetre)
I love the resolution of my laptop screen. It is 1920 pixels wide by 1200 pixels high while still only being 17 inches diagonally.
The best dot pitch I've found in a mainstream computer monitor is in a 19 inch screen with a resolution of 1680 by 1050. However, that is still 27% larger dots than my laptop screen. Here is a comparison of my laptop screen to all the common "wide screen" (16:10 ratio) monitors available:
| Panel size | Width | Height | Dot Pitch | % bigger dots than laptop | |||||
| cm | pixels | cm | pixels | ||||||
| 17 | " | 43.18 | cm | 36.6 | 1920 | 22.9 | 1200 | 0.0191 | 0% |
| 19 | " | 48.26 | cm | 40.9 | 1680 | 25.6 | 1050 | 0.0244 | 22% |
| 15.6 | " | 39.624 | cm | 33.6 | 1366 | 21 | 768 | 0.0246 | 22% |
| 30 | " | 76.2 | cm | 64.6 | 2560 | 40.4 | 1600 | 0.0252 | 24% |
| 20.1 | " | 51.054 | cm | 43.3 | 1680 | 27.1 | 1050 | 0.0258 | 26% |
| 23 | " | 58.42 | cm | 49.5 | 1920 | 31 | 1200 | 0.0258 | 26% |
| 24 | " | 60.96 | cm | 51.7 | 1920 | 32.3 | 1200 | 0.0269 | 29% |
| 22 | " | 55.88 | cm | 47.4 | 1680 | 29.6 | 1050 | 0.0282 | 32% |
| 19 | " | 48.26 | cm | 40.9 | 1440 | 25.6 | 900 | 0.0284 | 33% |
| 25.5 | " | 64.77 | cm | 54.9 | 1920 | 34.3 | 1200 | 0.0286 | 33% |
| 28 | " | 71.12 | cm | 60.3 | 1920 | 37.7 | 1200 | 0.0314 | 39% |
I would very much like to be able to get a desktop version (or 3) of my laptop's display, however, I fear the market for such a screen would be far too "nitch" to be populated.

0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home